The $848 billion figure is based on a 10-year run beginning in 2010 when there will be little, if any, spending — even though the taxes that fund the new welfare state program will begin the next year. In fact, only 1% of the spending will come in the first four years of the 10 years the Democrats are counting, according to the Congressional Budget Office.Now, that's criminal masterminding at its finest.
I'm sure the Dems are betting the American electorate won't notice the sleight of hand, or if they do they won't pressure Congress enough to kill the scam (or pressure any future one to repeal it). And the Dems might well be right.
What IDB doesn't add is that if the Feds spent only a few thousand dollars it would still be a moral crime. If, by some impossible miracle the Feds' health care plan actually did lower costs and improve quality, they would still have imposed it by force. In the process they'll have violated the rights to life, property, and voluntary trade, making it an actual crime according to the now-defunct U.S. Constitution.
If the Progressives had any courage — yes, I know, don't laugh — they would agree to the following deal...
Want to bitch about the cost of national defense (a Constitutional activity), and argue that it justifies massive welfare spending (an unconstitutional one)? Fine. Make you a deal, Lefties. Let's make contributing to both completely voluntary. Then, after three years, let's sum up how much funding has been provided to each category.
Betcha a trillion dollars the highly trusted military* gets a million times more money from voluntary donations than Social Security and Medicare combined. So, going by the progressives' Rousseauian "its the will of the people" justification for all coercive social legislation, we should pretty much end welfare.
That's a gamble I'm betting the thugs in Washington will never take.
[*Note: According to several Gallup polls, the military is trusted "a great deal" more than organized religion by about 45% to 29%, with Congress down at 6%.]
2 comments:
The immorality and fraud boil down to pork:
You don't need a combined 4K pages + to say "We're gonna rob productive people so as to make sure dopers, drunks, sodomites and anyone who whines they are poor has health coverage for their largely self-inflicted maladies". You need it to disguise all the graff, payoffs and buy-offs it took to get everybody on board this massive state gravy train, and the bastards got a whole nother year to write in as much more as they want!
We are SOOOOOOOOOOOOO screwed.
Sorry, Ted, you lost me this time. What's that about another year? Are you referring to the year until the 2010 elections?
If so, I wish I could share your optimism that they'll get booted out, and not replaced by another pack just like 'em.
Post a Comment